Lawyers Weigh In On High Court's Offensive-TM Ruling

Law360, New York (June 19, 2017, 8:00 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday decided in Matal v. Tam that the federal government's ban on offensive-trademark registrations violates the First Amendment. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision is significant.

  Ron Abramson, Lewis Baach PLLC

"In today's decision, there was no dissent from any side of the spectrum. The differences in the bases for the separate opinions of the justices were nuanced, going to whether it was necessary to address additional questions such as whether registered trademarks represent government of private speech. One group said it was private speech — and thus highly protected — and a second...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!