We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Specific Personal Jurisdiction: The Unanswered Questions

Law360, New York (July 14, 2017, 12:23 PM EDT) -- Personal jurisdiction fans and the tort bar eagerly awaited the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last month in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California, 137 S. Ct. 1773.[1]

In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the high court considered whether nonresident plaintiffs allegedly injured by Plavix, a drug manufactured by defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb, could join California residents’ mass action lawsuits in California state court, even though the nonresident plaintiffs’ claims were unconnected to California. The Supreme Court held that California courts lacked specific personal jurisdiction over nonresident plaintiffs because “all...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.