How Calif.’s Anti-SLAPP Law Affects Amended Complaints

Law360, New York (November 8, 2017, 6:50 PM EST) -- As noted by the California courts of appeal, “Under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, a defendant may bring a special motion to strike a cause of action arising from constitutionally protected speech or petitioning activity.”[1] According to the court in Varian Medical Systems v. Delfino, this law “establishes a procedure where the trial court evaluates the merits of the lawsuit using a summary judgment-like procedure at an early stage of the litigation.”[2]

The anti-SLAPP law, however, “is a complex statute” and its “complexities” have “spawned a ‘plethora of appellate litigation.’”[3] Below, we examine two of the complex subjects implicated by the anti-SLAPP statute —...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!