We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Daubert And Product Liability: Mid-2017 Update — Part 1

Law360, New York (July 17, 2017, 11:00 AM EDT) -- I’ve written about the U.S. Supreme Court’s Daubert opinion before, tagging it with the label “junk science.” The phrase “junk science” never actually appeared in Daubert, but rooting it out has been the animating concern behind the application of Daubert. See, e.g., Amorgianos v. National RR Passenger Corp., 303 F. 3d 256, 267 (2nd Cir., 2002) (“The flexible Daubert inquiry gives the district court the discretion needed to ensure that the courtroom door remains closed to junk science while admitting reliable expert testimony that will assist...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.