Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:11-md-02262

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Multi-district Litigation

Judge:

Naomi Reice Buchwald

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 20, 2017

    Investors, Banks Trade Shots In Libor Case

    Investors this week continued to spar with the banks they accuse of manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate over the dismissal of investor claims last year, while the court ordered another plaintiff to resubmit its complaint.

  2. January 09, 2017

    Remaining Antitrust Claims Fail In Libor MDL, Banks Say

    Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and other banks accused by investors of manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate on Friday asked a New York federal court to ax the remaining claims against them in the multidistrict litigation, saying they were insufficient for several reasons.

  3. January 04, 2017

    Investors Ask Judge To Revisit Dismissals In Libor MDL

    Freddie Mac, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Principal Financial Group Inc. have asked a New York federal judge to reconsider last month’s dismissal of some of their allegations regarding an alleged conspiracy by big banks to rig the London Interbank Offered Rate, saying the court overlooked key facts.

  4. December 20, 2016

    Bondholders Dismissed From Bank Libor Conspiracy MDL

    A New York federal judge Tuesday dismissed a class of bondholders from multidistrict litigation accusing big banks of rigging the London Interbank Offered Rate, saying their alleged antitrust injuries were not caused by the banks.

  5. December 05, 2016

    Investor Libor Antitrust Arguments Fail, JPMorgan Says

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. told a New York federal court on Friday to ignore supplementary arguments by investors in Libor antitrust litigation against it and other banks, saying they are improper because the investors fail to satisfy the "efficient enforcer" requirements for pleading antitrust claims.

  6. October 27, 2016

    Investors Say US Court Has Jurisdiction To Hear Libor Suit

    In a three-hour standing-room-only hearing in a Manhattan courtroom, an attorney for investors urged a New York federal judge not to dismiss their antitrust allegations against JPMorgan, Credit Suisse and other banks claiming a global conspiracy, and rebutted the banks' assertion that the suppression of the Libor was outside the court's jurisdiction.

  7. October 26, 2016

    UBS, Barclays Settle With Bondholders In Libor Suit

    Bondholders suing major banks for allegedly conspiring to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate told a Manhattan federal judge on Wednesday that they have settled with UBS AG and Barclays Bank PLC.

  8. October 12, 2016

    Libor Plaintiffs Say Metals Ruling Backs Standing Claims

    Investors suing JPMorgan Chase & Co. and other banks for allegedly manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate continued to fight against the banks' bid for dismissal of their antitrust claims, arguing Wednesday that a recent New York federal court decision in precious metals price-fixing cases supports their claims.

  9. October 05, 2016

    Banks Say Forex Ruling Changes Nothing In Libor Case

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. and other banks accused of manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate told a federal judge on Tuesday that a recent decision involving foreign exchange rates does not change their argument that the plaintiffs in their case cannot be considered “efficient enforcers” of the antitrust laws.

  10. September 21, 2016

    Banks Lose Bid To Strike Lenders' Libor Class Claims

    A New York federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a request by banks accused of manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate to strike class allegations by lenders who brought the claims, saying the banks' arguments, though substantial, are not yet ripe.