Uber's 'Frivolous' Arguments Shouldn't Bar Cert., Class Says

Law360 (October 16, 2020, 8:13 PM EDT) -- A proposed class of California Uber drivers seeking reclassification as employees rebutted the ride-hailing company's arguments against class certification on Thursday, saying the court had previously certified a similar class under more stringent guidelines and calling Uber's claims "frivolous" and "disingenuous."

The plaintiffs said their misclassification claims, which argue that Uber denied drivers minimum wage and overtime, sick leave and expense reimbursements, are easily sufficient for certification, according to a reply brief filed in California federal court.

"It seems clear that a class should be certified here," said Shannon Liss-Riordan, an attorney for the plaintiffs. "Uber's arguments against it have already...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!