High Court Backs Uber’s Arbitration Bid, 2nd Circ. Told

Law360, New York (May 18, 2017, 7:29 PM EDT) -- Uber asked the Second Circuit on Tuesday to heed a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that purportedly reinforces the ride-hailing company's arguments that class allegations of Uber and its drivers colluding to raise prices belong in arbitration.

Counsel for Uber Technologies Inc. and its founder Travis Kalanick cited the high court’s ruling Monday in Kindred Nursing Centers LP v. Clark — which held that the Federal Arbitration Act’s enforcement does not rely on a court recognizing that the arbitration agreement was valid as formed — to...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Meyer v. Kalanick


Case Number

16-2750

Court

Appellate - 2nd Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 STATUTES-Antitrust

Date Filed

August 5, 2016

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.