Law360, New York (October 23, 2015, 6:12 PM EDT) -- Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state professional regulatory boards are not inherently shielded from antitrust challenges in February, a number of suits have piled into federal courts across the country, arguing that everything from rules requiring background checks for taxi app service drivers to disciplinary actions over dog vaccine doses thwart competition.
The split decision in the Federal Trade Commission's case against North Carolina's dental board held that state boards controlled by active market participants don't automatically qualify for what is known as state action immunity. While states and other government entities can generally escape antitrust liability if they...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!