7th Circ. Questions Standing In Chicago Home-Share Reg Suit

Law360 (January 14, 2019, 10:07 PM EST) -- Too much "meaningful" time has passed since an advocacy group and several individuals launched their challenge to Chicago's short-term rental regulations for the plaintiffs to clearly prove they still have standing to pursue their case, the Seventh Circuit held Monday.

The unanimous, three-judge panel said Keep Chicago Livable LLC and each individual challenging Chicago's home-sharing regulations have experienced too many significant changes in fact and circumstance, from relocating to changing jobs, to establish that they have the same standing to sue as they did when launching their suits in 2016.

"We emphasize that our inquiry focuses on the here and now,"...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!