Can Silence Keep You Safe? New Debate On 10b-5 Liability

Law360, New York (January 20, 2015, 10:57 AM EST) -- In Stratte-McClure v. Morgan Stanley, 13-0627-cv, U.S. App. LEXIS 428 (2d Cir. Jan. 12, 2015), the Second Circuit issued a decision that confirmed that the decision to remain silent when Item 303 of Regulation S-K requires a company to speak can constitute an actionable violation of Rule 10b-5 so long as the other requirements of Rule 10b-5 are met. The Second Circuit acknowledged that its holding in Stratte-McClure constituted both an issue of first impression for the Second Circuit and set up a circuit split with the Ninth Circuit which recently held, in In re NVIDIA Corp. Securities Litigation, 768 F....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!