Justices Cut Through 'Gibberish' To Uphold Shareholder Suits

By Ed Beeson (March 20, 2018, 9:15 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday showed it could cut a direct path through difficult statutory language when it ruled that investors could keep bringing certain securities class actions in state courts — and issued a decision that defense attorneys warned will cause a flood of new shareholder suits before state judges around the country.

The 9-0 decision in Cyan Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund found the justices roundly rejecting the former telecommunications company's arguments that a 1998 law had precluded investors from bringing certain securities class actions anywhere but in federal court.

In doing so, the high court showed that statutory...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!