NCAA Athletes Rip 'Myth' Of Amateurism In Trial Closings

By Dorothy Atkins (October 19, 2018, 9:04 PM EDT) -- NCAA athletes on Friday blasted the association's rules limiting athlete compensation in written closing arguments of a landmark antitrust trial, arguing that fans won't stop watching college sports if athletes are paid and amateurism is an "economically invalid" myth.

In a 51-page redacted brief, the athletes argued that the NCAA failed to provide credible evidence that shows paying athletes would harm the demand for college sports or impact how student-athletes integrate into college campuses.

"Defendants' complete failure of proof is a result of the fact that amateurism and integration have been exposed at trial as economically invalid myths clung to only...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!