NCAA Falls 'Far Short' In Antitrust Trial Closings, Athletes Say
Law360 (November 20, 2018, 8:27 PM EST) -- NCAA athletes on Tuesday fired back at the association’s closing arguments in a landmark antitrust federal bench trial in California over NCAA rules that limit athlete compensation, arguing that the NCAA’s evidence falls “far short” of proving that its rules improve demand for college sports or help athletes integrate on campuses.
In a 27-page reply brief, the athletes argued that the NCAA’s closing arguments relied on speculative lay-witness testimony provided by six “handpicked and non-representative witnesses,” who based their opinions on untestable hearsay statements from anonymous college sports fans.
The athletes said the association also pointed to its own own bylaws and...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!