Disbarred Atty Can't Beat Prison Term Over 'Confused' Judge
Law360 (May 16, 2019, 6:46 PM EDT) -- The Third Circuit on Thursday nixed a disbarred attorney’s bid to toss his revised 41-month prison term for his role in bogus investment schemes, rejecting his claims that a New Jersey federal judge was “confused” about its prior rulings and “unprepared” to conduct the resentencing hearing.
Among other arguments, former criminal defense attorney Pasquale “Pat” Stiso made those allegations in challenging U.S. District Judge William J. Martini’s “fairness” during his 2017 resentencing, but a circuit panel said that “attack on the soundness of the proceeding is entirely unsupported by the record.”
“The district court carefully conducted the resentencing,” the panel said...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.