Calif. High Court Says All Recorded Cell Calls Need Consent

By Dave Simpson (April 1, 2021, 10:49 PM EDT) -- Both parties and nonparties must get consent from everyone on a cellular or wireless phone call before making a recording, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday, reversing an appellate court's finding that only third-party eavesdroppers must get consent.

The unanimous decision, penned by Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, agreed with plaintiff Jeremiah Smith that Section 632.7 of the California Penal Code requires all participants on a phone call to consent to a recording, overturning a 2019 ruling from the Fourth Appellate District.

"This interpretation reflects the most sensible reading of the statutory text, is consistent with the relevant legislative history, and...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!