Snub-Hub: Courts Apply More Scrutiny To Class Settlements

Law360, New York (October 2, 2014, 10:16 AM EDT) -- Several recent rulings suggest that courts are applying increased scrutiny to class settlements, and to the parties’ representations that the settlement is the result of good faith negotiation and is fair and adequate for class members. Counsel on both sides would be wise to examine this trend.

A California judge's recent rejection of a $2 million class settlement in Saunders v. StubHub Inc. is just the latest example.[1] San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ernest Goldsmith nixed final approval of a proposed $2 million settlement between StubHub and a putative class of 69,000 customers who claimed that the ticket reseller violated California’s...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS