Possible Conflict Of Interest In NJ Sports Betting Case

Law360, New York (October 31, 2014, 10:39 AM EDT) -- On Oct. 24, U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp granted a petition sought by the National Football League and other leagues to temporarily restrain New Jersey from giving effect to new legislation partially repealing its ban against sports betting. (See my Law360 Expert Analysis piece on this subject here.) Had the legislation gone into effect, New Jersey's privately owned (but state-licensed and regulated) casinos and racetracks would have been able to offer sports wagering to their patrons beginning on Oct. 26. While Judge Shipp's order is only of interim effect, as a practical matter it sets in motion a likely end to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's efforts to bring legalized sports betting to the Garden State....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!