Attorneys React To High Court's Tyson Class Action Ruling

Law360, New York (March 22, 2016, 7:53 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday affirmed a $5.8 million judgment against Tyson Foods in a worker don-doff case, holding that averages and other statistical analyses can be used to show similarities between disparate class members. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the Supreme Court's ruling in Tyson Foods Inc. v. Bouaphakeo is significant.

Randy Avram, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 

"Tyson gives employees another tool for bringing class action lawsuits against their employers. It was a donning and doffing case, but its significance is that the court made it clear that now class action plaintiffs can use statistics to fill evidentiary...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!