Law360, New York (June 16, 2017, 2:02 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's decision one year ago in Universal Health Services v. Escobar has jolted False Claims Act litigation by creating a new approach to "implied certification" cases involving undisclosed noncompliance. Here, attorneys tell Law360 about key ways in which the decision has been applied.
Brian Tully McLaughlin, Crowell & Moring LLP
"Two circuit courts — the Third Circuit in Petratos v. Genentech Inc. and the Fourth Circuit in Badr v. Triple Canopy — have recently relied on the government’s intervention decision in determining the materiality of an alleged false claim. This raises a question as to whether the largely...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!