Ill. Biometric Privacy Suits Must Claim Actual Harm, Court Says

By Allison Grande (December 22, 2017, 4:54 PM EST) -- An Illinois state appeals court in a dispute involving the allegedly unlawful collection of fingerprints from a Six Flags season pass holder ruled Thursday that plaintiffs must claim some actual harm in order to be considered an "aggrieved person" covered by the state's unique Biometric Information Privacy Act.

Stacy Rosenbach, whose son's thumbprint was taken by Six Flags after he purchased a season pass for one of its Great America theme parks, sued Six Flags Entertainment Corp. and Great America LLC in 2016 for allegedly violating Illinois' biometric privacy statute by failing to properly obtain written consent or disclosing their plan...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!