2 Del. Decisions Call Out Conflicted Controlling Stockholders
By Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, Brian Mangino and Andrew Colosimo (October 30, 2019, 6:06 PM EDT) -- Two recent Delaware Chancery Court decisions — Tornetta v. Musk et al. and In re BGC Partners Inc. Derivative Litigation — highlight the Delaware courts' "reflexive skepticism," in the words of Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights, with respect to transactions involving conflicted controllers.
The court emphasized in these cases the potential for coercive influence by controlling stockholders over directors (who the controller typically can remove or not reappoint) and unaffiliated stockholders (who the controller can harm through retributive acts such as a squeeze-out merger or cutting dividends).
Retiring Delaware Chief Justice Leo Strine characterized controllers as "800-pound gorillas" in a previous case, quoted in...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!