NCAA Preps For High Court Student-Athlete Pay Case Review

Law360, New York (March 3, 2016, 4:11 PM EST) -- The NCAA said Thursday it has requested an extension from the Ninth Circuit to file a petition for U.S. Supreme Court review of a decision that found its ban on compensation for the use of student-athletes' images and likenesses was anti-competitive.

The Ninth Circuit in December denied a motion for rehearing en banc lodged by the former student-athletes that challenged a portion of the panel’s decision finding that the athletes did not have to be paid beyond the cost of attending college. In a statement Thursday, NCAA...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Edward O'Bannon, Jr. v. NCAA, et al


Case Number

14-16601

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

August 21, 2014


Case Title

Edward O'Bannon, Jr. v. NCAA, et al


Case Number

14-17068

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

October 21, 2014

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.