NCAA Preps For High Court Student-Athlete Pay Case Review

Law360, New York (March 3, 2016, 4:11 PM EST) -- The NCAA said Thursday it has requested an extension from the Ninth Circuit to file a petition for U.S. Supreme Court review of a decision that found its ban on compensation for the use of student-athletes' images and likenesses was anti-competitive.

The Ninth Circuit in December denied a motion for rehearing en banc lodged by the former student-athletes that challenged a portion of the panel’s decision finding that the athletes did not have to be paid beyond the cost of attending college. In a statement Thursday, NCAA...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Edward O'Bannon, Jr. v. NCAA, et al


Case Number

14-16601

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

August 21, 2014


Case Title

Edward O'Bannon, Jr. v. NCAA, et al


Case Number

14-17068

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

October 21, 2014

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.