The Potential Reach Of High Court's New Slant On Trademarks

By Roberta Jacobs-Meadway and Tyler Harttraft (July 5, 2017, 11:56 AM EDT) -- Matal v. Tam holds 15 U.S.C. 1052(a) unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause, as it related to trademarks deemed to be disparaging to, inter alia, groups of people ("any person, living or dead"). The opinion, which affirms the Federal Circuit's reversal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's refusal of registration to the mark "The Slants" for, inter alia, entertainment services, does not directly address other bars to registration, including the same section's prohibition against registration of marks deemed to be "immoral" or "scandalous," a prohibition that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the Federal Circuit have defined as "vulgar," with reference to whether or not a dictionary definition identifies a term (or some recognizable version or variation of it) as "vulgar."...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!