NCAA's Experts Defend Athlete Pay Restrictions At Trial

By Dorothy Atkins (September 6, 2018, 9:04 PM EDT) -- Two economists paid by the National Collegiate Athletic Association on Thursday defended rules restricting student-athlete pay in a California federal bench trial over allegations the NCAA's grant-in-aid caps violate antitrust laws, with one testifying that removing the rules would degrade amateur sports as a product.

University of Virginia economics professor Kenneth Elzinga testified in the landmark trial in Oakland that fans value amateurism, and that removing the NCAA's rules that limit the benefits players are allowed to receive would not provide viewers with a better product. He added that teams could always leave the NCAA if they wanted to pay athletes....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!