Justices Consider Allowing Payouts For Religious Burdens

By Jimmy Hoover (October 6, 2020, 7:17 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed open to the idea of allowing plaintiffs to seek money damages from government officials who put burdens on their free exercise of religion, as the justices heard a case against FBI agents who allegedly put Muslim men on the no-fly list after they refused to become informants.

During a telephone argument session Tuesday, various justices grilled a lawyer for the federal government on why plaintiffs can't seek payouts from government employees under the 1993 Religious Freedom and Restoration Act, which authorizes "appropriate relief" against government "officials" for violations of religious exercise.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!