Law360 (October 20, 2020, 6:10 PM EDT) -- Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court opened its new term and heard arguments in FNU Tanzin v. Tanvir — an important case regarding the scope of remedies available to plaintiffs filing suit under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA.
The case centers on an unquestionably sympathetic set of facts: Three Muslim men sought damages against several FBI agents who allegedly violated the RFRA by placing the three men on the government's no-fly list as retaliation for refusing to serve as informants in their community for religious reasons.
Regardless of how the Supreme Court rules, its decision will significantly impact how...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!