We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close


Post-Spokeo Trends Offer Clues For Standing In Privacy Suits

Law360, New York (February 15, 2017, 5:59 PM EST) -- Federal courts in New York and Los Angeles came to opposite conclusions last month in trying to apply the U.S. Supreme Court's Spokeo ruling to high-profile privacy cases, yet attorneys see in those decisions hints as to how courts will decide whether plaintiffs suffered real harm in alleged invasions of privacy or unauthorized releases of personal information.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May in Spokeo v. Robins that plaintiffs must show a concrete injury, not just that a statute was violated, to establish standing under...
To view the full article, register now.



Case Information

Case Title

Cruper - Weinmann v. Paris Baguette America, Inc

Case Number



New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Consumer Credit


Jed S. Rakoff

Date Filed

October 3, 2013

Case Title

Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness Group, et al

Case Number



Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

June 19, 2014

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.