Analysis

Post-Spokeo Trends Offer Clues For Standing In Privacy Suits

Law360, New York (February 15, 2017, 5:59 PM EST) -- Federal courts in New York and Los Angeles came to opposite conclusions last month in trying to apply the U.S. Supreme Court's Spokeo ruling to high-profile privacy cases, yet attorneys see in those decisions hints as to how courts will decide whether plaintiffs suffered real harm in alleged invasions of privacy or unauthorized releases of personal information.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May in Spokeo v. Robins that plaintiffs must show a concrete injury, not just that a statute was violated, to establish standing under...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Cruper - Weinmann v. Paris Baguette America, Inc


Case Number

1:13-cv-07013

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Consumer Credit

Judge

Jed S. Rakoff

Date Filed

October 3, 2013


Case Title

Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness Group, et al


Case Number

14-55980

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

June 19, 2014

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.