COVID-19 IP Catch-Up: Courts Divided On Getting IP To Trial

By Dani Kass
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our daily newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the daily Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Employment newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!



Law360 (May 22, 2020, 7:30 PM EDT) -- Intellectual property proceedings impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic have been pressing along on different timelines throughout the country, with live oral arguments resumed for a case in Michigan, trials further delayed in California and witnesses allowed to stay home in New York. The Federal Circuit, taking the state-by-state unpredictability into account, has called off in-person arguments indefinitely. 

National

The Federal Circuit on May 18 suspended in-person arguments "until further notice," abandoning the month-by-month approach it had been taking to extend remote oral arguments. Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sharon Prost said the move was made "in the interest of providing greater predictability" to attorneys, given complications rising from the court's national jurisdiction.

Law360 also took a deep look  at a new U.S. Patent and Trademark Office program that will prioritize the examination of COVID-19-related patent applications from small businesses. Attorneys said that while it could result in patents issuing very quickly, applicants need to make sure the program makes sense for their invention.

California

The Northern District of California's top judge on Thursday said the court won't be holding any civil jury trials through the end of September. That included pushing off a patent trial between Finjan and Cisco Systems Inc. that was set to begin June 1.

In Los Angeles, the pandemic led to discovery and pretrial motion deadlines being pushed in an antitrust battle between Global Music Rights LLC and Radio Music License Committee Inc. over music licensing fees.

New York

On Wednesday, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks said new lawsuits can be filed in New York starting May 25.

He said the state court system will allow new e-filed cases, given that judges and staff in 30 counties upstate were allowed to return to their courthouses, even as court staff in the harder-hit downstate areas continue to conduct business remotely.

That same day in Manhattan federal court, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon said she won't require witnesses to testify in person in a July bench trial between Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Serenity Pharmaceuticals LLC. The patent fight is over Ferring's nighttime urination medication Nocdurna.

Ferring had argued that witnesses who are able to appear in person should be required to do so, leading Serenity to shoot back that such an order would be "unfair and dangerous." Serenity said many of its witnesses are over 60 years old and they shouldn't be required to travel to the epicenter of the pandemic.

Michigan

Live oral arguments were back on in Grand Rapids, as Chief U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Jonker on Thursday oversaw summary judgment proceedings in a patent fight over car mirrors.

When the judge said on May 1 that the hearings would proceed in person, he asked the parties, Magna Mirrors of America Inc. and SMR Automotive Mirrors UK Ltd., to "consider sensible accommodations" to limit exposure to the virus, such as keeping attendance small and relying more on local counsel.

"To the extent travel is necessary, maybe counsel can consider an old fashioned road trip instead of airline travel," the judge had said. "There is plenty of time between now and May 21, gas is cheap, and springtime blossoms make driving more visually rewarding than flying. Plus, this is a case about car mirrors."

--Additional reporting by Ryan Davis, Frank G. Runyeon and Dorothy Atkins. Editing by Abbie Sarfo.

For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.

View comments

Attached Documents

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Global Music Rights, LLC v. Radio Music License Committee, Inc et al


Case Number

2:16-cv-09051

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Judge

Terry J. Hatter, Jr

Date Filed

December 06, 2016


Case Title

Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.


Case Number

5:17-cv-00072

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Beth Labson Freeman

Date Filed

January 06, 2017


Case Title

Magna Mirrors of America, Inc. v. Samvardhana Motherson Reflectec Group Holdings Limited et al


Case Number

1:17-cv-00077

Court

Michigan Western

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Robert J. Jonker

Date Filed

January 23, 2017


Case Title

Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Serenity Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al


Case Number

1:17-cv-09922

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Patent

Judge

Colleen McMahon

Date Filed

December 20, 2017

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!