Expert Analysis

• Opinion

  Illinois Should Vacate Convictions Tainted By Racist Counsel

  

  After the Illinois Supreme Court’s recent suspension of a public defender’s law license over racist online threats, prosecutors should move to vacate the convictions of every Black client he represented, as an attorney’s racial animus is a serious conflict of interest akin to structural error, says Adam Murphy at Fordham Law.

• FCA Deal Shows Conflict Review Must Go Beyond Bid Stage

  

  A defense contractor’s recent settlement over False Claims Act allegations stemming from its employment of a U.S. Department of Defense official illustrates that conflict of interest assessment should be an ongoing compliance function, not just a proposal-stage checklist, say attorneys at Fluet.

• Why And How To Build A Neurodiversity-Informed Practice

  

  By better understanding neurodiversity and implementing simple accommodations for clients with autism, ADHD or learning differences, attorneys can build stronger relationships with those who may otherwise struggle to obtain and benefit from legal services, while developing good habits that will benefit everyone they represent, says Ting Cheung at Sanford Heisler.

• Series

  Illinois Banking Brief: All The Notable Legal Updates In Q3

  

  Recent banking developments in Illinois include significant new consumer protection legislation, three meaningful Seventh Circuit decisions, and a high-profile constitutional challenge to the state's new digital asset tax, say attorneys at Barnes & Thornburg.

• Understanding Risks Of Employees' AI-Drafted Complaints

  

  As employees increasingly use generative artificial intelligence to draft complaints about workplace misconduct, investigators must adapt their practices so that the process remains fair, thorough and grounded in fact, says Rebecca Foxwell at Bracewell.

• Prediction Market Case Tests Novel Insider Trading Theory

  

  The government's argument in its case against a soldier accused of using classified information to bet on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's capture would represent a sea change in how insider trading wire fraud has been prosecuted for decades, says Alex Blanchard at Holland & Knight.

• Abbott FCA Deal Shows Enforcement Adequacy Quandaries

  

  Abbott Laboratories’ recent False Claims Act resolution illustrates several tricky questions that both prosecutors and defense counsel must address when weighing whether a civil enforcement action alone adequately addresses allegedly wrongful conduct, says James Koukios at MoFo.

• Opinion

  Clancy Trial Shows Need For Juror Anonymity Reforms

  

  Doxing of the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder mistrial in Massachusetts illustrates the increasing need to provide jurors with greater protection once service ends in high-profile cases, balancing concerns about transparency and independence, says Daniel Schneider at Offit Kurman.

• How Wells Notice Ruling Signals Future Of SEC Enforcement

  

  The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's recent opinion in a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority disciplinary proceeding is, on its face, a decision about the scope of FINRA's power, but it also illustrates how the SEC expects its own enforcement program to operate, say attorneys at Fridman Fels.

• NY Art Ruling Creates Fault Line In Cultural Property Cases

  

  A recent New York state appellate decision, blocking a Holocaust victim’s heirs from using a criminal turnover order to reclaim a work the Art Institute of Chicago says it acquired legally, makes establishing ownership a newly central question in cultural property disputes, says Duncan Levin at Levin & Associates.

• Texas Medicaid Fraud Decision Leaves 2 Open Questions

  

  The Texas Supreme Court's decision in Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Texas and NPT Associates, holding that the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act's omissions provision requires proof of materiality, creates ambiguity about the materiality requirement and about how Texas courts will treat federal precedent going forward, say attorneys at Sidley.

• FinCEN Exemption Raises Statutory, Administrative Questions

  

  The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's recently rolled-out broad exemption for U.S. companies from Corporate Transparency Act reporting may face administrative law and statutory challenges, so businesses should still preserve ownership records and monitor litigation and congressional action, says David McCarville at Fennemore.

• Opinion

  CFTC's New Award Policy Punishes Whistleblower Success

  

  The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently capped four whistleblower awards because it considered them too large, arguing that it could lead to frivolous reporting, but the move instead penalizes the program for its own success and flies in the face of the framework enacted by Congress, say attorneys at Whistleblower Partners.

• Testing AI's Promise For Large-Scale Document Review

  

  Our document-review comparison of attorneys' responsiveness and issue coding decisions versus predictions generated by artificial intelligence across 1,600 documents suggests that these tools can offer a reasonable and reliable basis for improved discovery workflows, provided lawyers understand where guardrails are needed, say attorneys at Redgrave.

• AI Meeting Recaps Pose New Discovery And Privilege Risks

  

  The New York City Bar Association’s recent ethics opinion, cautioning attorneys not to record nonclient conversations with artificial intelligence tools, reflects an emerging view that AI meeting recaps are now a distinct business record category, meaning counsel should set meeting-level controls and apply framework-level updates, says William Wright at Faegre Drinker.