Curious Case Of The Class Cert. Evidentiary Standard: Part 2

By Robert Sparkes (June 14, 2018, 11:56 AM EDT) -- Part one of this article examined the divergent decisions from the U.S. circuit courts of appeals addressing whether federal courts may consider only admissible evidence when evaluating motions for class certification. As set forth in part one, the majority of the circuit courts that have addressed the issue have made clear that district courts should not consider inadmissible evidence, both expert and nonexpert, at the class certification stage. The minority of circuit courts (the Eighth and Ninth Circuits, specifically), however, have ruled that evidence considered at the class certification stage "need not be admissible evidence."[1]

Part two of this article presents...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!