Kitchen Sink Litigation Clogs The Judicial Pipeline

Law360, New York (June 24, 2013, 1:00 PM EDT) -- Modern litigation has evolved such that complaints are often filed with as many causes of action as possible, no matter how attenuated — not unlike an issue-spotting exam in law school. Under this “kitchen sink” approach, defendants must navigate a mire of claims, some of which lack any merit or are duplicative, before reaching the true issues in the case. The natural result is an increase of time and fees expended by the parties, greater drain on the time and resources of the court, and difficulty reaching the merits.

Part of the strategy with this approach — assuming there is one...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!