Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:07-md-01827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Taylor & Patchen
- Winston & Strawn
- Fillmore Spencer
- Melton Law Firm PLLC
- Baker McKenzie
- Emerson Firm
- SSL Law Firm
- Murphy Pearson
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Manchester Williams & Seibert
- Polsinelli PC
- Bartlit Beck
- Freed Kanner
- Gustafson Gluek
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Stebner Gertler
- Farmer Brownstein
- Baute Crochetiere
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Goodwin Procter
- Girardi & Keese
- Godfrey & Kahn
- A&O Shearman
- Berger Montague
- Nossaman LLP
- Bryan Cave
- Jones Day
- Smith Dollar
- Vinson & Elkins
- Morgan Lewis
- Foreman & Brasso
- Alioto Law Firm
- White & Case
- Kaplan Fox
- Finnegan
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Lathrop GPM
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Carey Danis
- Benesch
- Nuti Hart
- Eimer Stahl
- Cooley LLP
- Atkinson Andelson
- Carr McClellan
- Stris & Maher
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Yenson Lynn
- Towe Ball
- WilmerHale
- Gross & Belsky
- Boies Schiller
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Morrison Frost
- Bird Marella
- Frankovitch Anetakis
- Freedman Boyd
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Covington & Burling
- Shook Hardy
- Lewis Brisbois
- Zelle LLP
- Cera LLP
- Girard Sharp
- Joshua R. Furman Law
- Lockridge Grindal
- Cohn Lifland
- Michaels Ward
- Pritzker Levine
- Lovell Stewart
- Mallison & Martinez
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Proskauer Rose
- Badgley Mullins
- Coffman Law Firm
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Seeger Weiss
- Guerrieri Clayman
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Robins Kaplan
- Hausfeld LLP
- Carlton Fields
- Diamond McCarthy
- Hadsell Stormer
- KTBS Law
- Brown Rudnick
- McCallister Law Group
- Spector Roseman
- Methvin Terrell
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Greenspoon Marder
- Berry Silberberg
- Cook Collection Attorneys
- K&L Gates
- The Terrell Law Group
- Munger Tolles
- O'Neil Cannon
- Herum Crabtree
- Law Offices of Lingel H. Winters
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Willenken LLP
- Pearson Warshaw
- Riordan & Horgan
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Gilman Law LLP
- Andrus Anderson
- Duane Morris
- Ellis George
- Strom Law Firm
- Buchalter APC
- Hagens Berman
- Friedman Kaplan
- Manfred APC
- LaMarca Law Group
- Tousley Brain
- Hirschfeld Kraemer
- Minami Tamaki
- Schubert Jonckheer
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- RJM Litigation Group
- Black Slaughter
- Albright Stoddard
- Law Offices of Jon T. King
- Duncan Firm
- Kreft Law
- BoiesBattin
- Derek G. Howard Law Firm
- Haglund Kelley
- Baker & Hostetler
- McKool Smith
- Gullett Sanford
- Jenkins Mulligan
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Keller Rohrback
- Perkins Coie
- Bandas Law Firm
- Weil Gotshal
- Gibson Dunn
- The Norton Law Firm
- Nixon Peabody
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Steptoe LLP
- Lieff Cabraser
- Davis Polk
- Sidley Austin
- Ogletree Deakins
- Spiegel Liao
- Crowell & Moring
- Farella Braun
- Lowther Johnson
- Sherrard Roe
- Klein Hockel
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Hillis Clark
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Heins Mills
- Cafferty Clobes
- Aylstock Witkin
- Kralowec Law
- SulmeyerKupetz
- Lanak & Hanna
- Larson LLP
- Trump Alioto
- McGowan Hood
- McManis Faulkner
- Alderson Alderson
- Cotchett Pitre
- Harder Mirell
- Taylor and Patchen
- Steven Williams Law
- Taus Cebulash
- Bingham McCutchen
- Ferguson Chambers
- Musick Peeler
- Dechert LLP
- Sheppard Mullin
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Bangs McCullen
- Lite DePalma
- Berman Tabacco
- Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman
- Sommers Schwartz
- Cohen Milstein
- Skaggs Faucette
- Wyatt & Blake
- Kirkpatrick & Goldsborough
- Zimmerman Reed
- Susman Godfrey
- Glancy Prongay
- Alston & Bird
- Kirby McInerney
- Stranch Jennings
- Bass Berry
- Orrick Herrington
- Damrell Nelson
- Jenner & Block
- Johnson Becker
- Glassman Wyatt
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Labaton Keller
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Saveri & Saveri
- Latham & Watkins
Companies
- CA Technologies
- Kmart Corp.
- Dell Technologies Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Toshiba Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- ePlus Inc.
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- MetroPCS Wireless Inc.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
- Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Costco
- The ODP Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- TracFone Wireless Inc.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- NEC Corp.
- Tech Data Corp.
- Ricoh Co. Ltd.
- ViewSonic Corp.
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- RadioShack Corporation
- Target Corp.
- Rockwell Automation Inc.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Magnolia Audio Video
- Nokia Corp.
- Sony Group Corp.
- EE Ltd.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Renesas Electronics Corp.
- Pacific Bells LLC
- Eastman Kodak Co.
- Seiko Epson Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Newegg Inc.
- Sears Holdings Corp.
- P.C. Richard & Son Inc.
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Signify N.V.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 06, 2012
Toshiba Says ATM Fee Ruling Dooms LCD Antitrust Claims
Toshiba Corp. became the latest electronics component maker Thursday to raise the Ninth Circuit's recent ATM fee antitrust litigation ruling to try to nix claims from companies that bought finished products incorporating allegedly price-fixed parts, arguing the plaintiffs don't have standing to seek damages.
-
July 26, 2012
LCD Buyers Say Toshiba Owes $87M Despite Paid-Up Award
A class of liquid crystal display buyers pushed Wednesday to protect its $87 million price-fixing verdict against Toshiba Corp., arguing that the electronics maker hadn't proved it could use the $443 million other defendants have already paid in settlements to offset the entire jury award.
-
July 23, 2012
LCD Makers Cite ATM Case In Bid To Nix Price-Fixing Claims
A group of liquid crystal display makers on Friday cited a recent Ninth Circuit ATM fee antitrust ruling in an attempt to nix price-fixing claims launched by Target Corp., AT&T Corp. and others, arguing that the decision bars the plaintiffs from bringing federal claims based on finished product purchases.
-
July 12, 2012
Toshiba Seeks To Avoid Damages On $87M LCD Verdict
Toshiba Corp. moved Wednesday to avoid paying damages after a class of direct purchasers of liquid crystal displays won an $87 million price-fixing verdict against the company, arguing that the $443 million the plaintiffs already won from other defendants should offset the jury award.
-
July 11, 2012
AUO, LG, Toshiba To Pay $571M In LCD Antitrust MDL
AU Optronics Corp., LG Display America Inc. and Toshiba Corp. have agreed to hand over $571 million to indirect purchasers who claimed the companies fixed the prices of flat-screen panels, an attorney for the screen purchasers said Wednesday.
-
July 09, 2012
Sharp To Pay Dell, Others $200M In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
Sharp Corp. reportedly said Monday that it will pay nearly $200 million to settle a dispute with Dell Inc. and two unnamed companies in California multidistrict litigation accusing it of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens.
-
June 28, 2012
Toshiba, LCD Purchasers Close Cases In Cartel Trial
Arguments in the direct purchaser class action alleging that Toshiba Corp. conspired to fix prices on liquid crystal display screens came to a close in California federal court on Thursday, sending the case to a jury more than a month after the trial started.
-
June 25, 2012
Costco's LCD Cartel Suit Overreaches, Electronics Cos. Say
Several companies accused of fixing prices of liquid crystal display screens told a California federal court on Friday that Costco Wholesale Corp. had no basis to bring claims based on its indirect purchases from electronics makers that aren't defendants or alleged co-conspirators.
-
June 20, 2012
Toshiba Denies Ties To LCD Price-Fixing Plot
Toshiba Corp. told a California federal court Wednesday that a direct-purchaser class has not presented enough evidence to back claims that the company participated in a seven-year conspiracy to fix prices on liquid crystal display screens.
-
May 17, 2012
Miss. Says $540M LCD Price-Fixing Deal Leaves It In Lurch
The state of Mississippi on Wednesday asked a California federal judge to modify a proposed $539 million settlement in multidistrict litigation involving allegations of price-fixing by major electronics manufacturers, claiming the settlement impermissibly bars ongoing litigation in state court.