Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:07-md-01827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Taylor & Patchen
- Winston & Strawn
- Fillmore Spencer
- Melton Law Firm PLLC
- Baker McKenzie
- Emerson Firm
- SSL Law Firm
- Murphy Pearson
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Manchester Williams & Seibert
- Bartlit Beck
- Freed Kanner
- Gustafson Gluek
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Stebner Gertler
- Farmer Brownstein
- Baute Crochetiere
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Goodwin Procter
- Girardi & Keese
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Smith Dollar
- Morgan Lewis
- Foreman & Brasso
- Alioto Law Firm
- White & Case
- Kaplan Fox
- Finnegan
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Lathrop GPM
- Carey Danis
- Nuti Hart
- Eimer Stahl
- Cooley LLP
- Atkinson Andelson
- Benesch
- Carr McClellan
- Stris & Maher
- Jones Day
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Shook Hardy
- Yenson Lynn
- Towe Ball
- WilmerHale
- Gross & Belsky
- Boies Schiller
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Morrison Frost
- Bird Marella
- Frankovitch Anetakis
- Freedman Boyd
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Zelle LLP
- Cera LLP
- Girard Sharp
- Vinson & Elkins
- Lewis Brisbois
- Berger Montague
- Bryan Cave
- Joshua R. Furman Law
- Lockridge Grindal
- Cohn Lifland
- Michaels Ward
- Pritzker Levine
- Lovell Stewart
- Mallison & Martinez
- K&L Gates
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Proskauer Rose
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Nossaman LLP
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Munger Tolles
- A&O Shearman
- Baker & Hostetler
- Badgley Mullins
- Perkins Coie
- Gibson Dunn
- Sidley Austin
- Crowell & Moring
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Cohen Milstein
- Ogletree Deakins
- Polsinelli PC
- Buchalter APC
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Coffman Law Firm
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Seeger Weiss
- Guerrieri Clayman
- Nedeau Law Firm
- Robins Kaplan
- Hausfeld LLP
- Carlton Fields
- Diamond McCarthy
- Hadsell Stormer
- KTBS Law
- Brown Rudnick
- McCallister Law Group
- Spector Roseman
- Methvin Terrell
- Cooper & Kirkham
- Greenspoon Marder
- Berry Silberberg
- Cook Collection Attorneys
- The Terrell Law Group
- O'Neil Cannon
- Herum Crabtree
- Law Offices of Lingel H. Winters
- Ehrlich & Craig
- Willenken LLP
- Pearson Warshaw
- Riordan & Horgan
- Gilman Law LLP
- Andrus Anderson
- Duane Morris
- Ellis George
- Strom Law Firm
- Hagens Berman
- Friedman Kaplan
- Manfred APC
- LaMarca Law Group
- Tousley Brain
- Hirschfeld Kraemer
- Minami Tamaki
- Schubert Jonckheer
- RJM Litigation Group
- Black Slaughter
- Albright Stoddard
- Law Offices of Jon T. King
- Duncan Firm
- Kreft Law
- BoiesBattin
- Derek G. Howard Law Firm
- Haglund Kelley
- McKool Smith
- Gullett Sanford
- Jenkins Mulligan
- Keller Rohrback
- Bandas Law Firm
- Weil Gotshal
- The Norton Law Firm
- Nixon Peabody
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Steptoe LLP
- Lieff Cabraser
- Davis Polk
- Spiegel Liao
- Farella Braun
- Lowther Johnson
- Sherrard Roe
- Klein Hockel
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Hillis Clark
- Law Offices of Francis O. Scarpulla
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Heins Mills
- Cafferty Clobes
- Aylstock Witkin
- Kralowec Law
- SulmeyerKupetz
- Lanak & Hanna
- Larson LLP
- Trump Alioto
- McGowan Hood
- McManis Faulkner
- Alderson Alderson
- Cotchett Pitre
- Harder Mirell
- Taylor and Patchen
- Steven Williams Law
- Taus Cebulash
- Bingham McCutchen
- Ferguson Chambers
- Musick Peeler
- Dechert LLP
- Sheppard Mullin
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Bangs McCullen
- Lite DePalma
- Berman Tabacco
- Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman
- Sommers Schwartz
- Skaggs Faucette
- Wyatt & Blake
- Kirkpatrick & Goldsborough
- Zimmerman Reed
- Susman Godfrey
- Glancy Prongay
- Alston & Bird
- Kirby McInerney
- Stranch Jennings
- Bass Berry
- Orrick Herrington
- Damrell Nelson
- Jenner & Block
- Johnson Becker
- Glassman Wyatt
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Labaton Keller
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Himmelstein Law Network
- Saveri & Saveri
- Latham & Watkins
Companies
- CA Technologies
- Kmart Corp.
- Dell Technologies Inc.
- Toshiba Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- ePlus Inc.
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- MetroPCS Wireless Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
- Mitsui & Co. Ltd.
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Costco
- The ODP Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- TracFone Wireless Inc.
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- NEC Corp.
- Tech Data Corp.
- Ricoh Co. Ltd.
- ViewSonic Corp.
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- RadioShack Corporation
- Target Corp.
- Rockwell Automation Inc.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Hitachi Ltd.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Magnolia Audio Video
- Nokia Corp.
- Sony Group Corp.
- EE Ltd.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Renesas Electronics Corp.
- Pacific Bells LLC
- Eastman Kodak Co.
- Seiko Epson Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Newegg Inc.
- Sears Holdings Corp.
- P.C. Richard & Son Inc.
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Signify N.V.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 16, 2012
2 LG Employees Can't Testify In LCD Price-Fixing Trial
Toshiba Corp. convinced a California federal judge Tuesday to block two LG Display Co. Ltd. employees from testifying for direct purchasers in the upcoming liquid crystal display price-fixing trial, but failed to win permission to use testimony presented in the AU Optronics Corp. criminal case.
-
April 30, 2012
LG Display Settles With 8 States, Consumers In LCD MDL
LG Display Co. Ltd. has become the last company to settle with a class of indirect purchasers in California multidistrict litigation accusing it of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens, it said in a regulatory filing Monday that also announced a settlement with eight states.
-
April 25, 2012
AUO, Toshiba Settle Consumer Claims In LCD MDL
AU Optronics Corp. and Toshiba Corp. have reached settlements with the indirect purchasers accusing them of fixing prices for liquid crystal display screens, remaining defendant LG Display Co. Ltd. said in a filing Wednesday reviving a dispute over how to structure the class action trial.
-
April 20, 2012
LCD Price-Fixing Trial Gets Split In Two
A California judge ruled Friday to split price-fixing litigation against AU Optronics Corp., LG Display Co. Ltd. and Toshiba Corp. into two stages, over the objections of the consumer plaintiffs and the three liquid crystal display makers.
-
April 19, 2012
LCD Makers, Consumers Oppose Split Trial In Price-Fixing MDL
Both the defendants and consumer plaintiffs in the liquid crystal display price-fixing litigation lambasted a new attempt from direct purchaser plaintiffs to break the trial into two parts, with the manufacturers calling the latest request Wednesday "even more unworkable" than the first plan.
-
April 16, 2012
Plaintiffs Make 2nd Bid To Split LCD Price-Fixing Trial
Direct purchasers on Friday moved to divide an upcoming trial against liquid-crystal display manufacturers including Toshiba Corp. and LG Display Co. Ltd. over alleged price-fixing, arguing that federal and state antitrust claims in the multidistrict litigation should be dealt with separately.
-
April 02, 2012
Sony Hurls New Cartel Claims At Hitachi, Toshiba In MDL
A pair of Sony Corp. units on Monday accused Hitachi Ltd. and Toshiba Corp. of forcing Sony to pay inflated prices for liquid crystal display panels by participating in an alleged cartel that so far has roped several industry players into the California multidistrict litigation.
-
March 22, 2012
Request For 2 Trials Shot Down In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to separate the long-running price-fixing case against a group of liquid crystal display makers into two trials, despite plaintiffs' arguments that doing so would simplify the case and would be less likely to confuse jurors.
-
March 21, 2012
Indirect Buyers Fight For Foreign Evidence In LCD MDL
With an April trial date fast approaching, an indirect purchaser class accusing liquid-crystal display makers of fixing prices fought back Tuesday against efforts from Toshiba Corp. and AU Optronics Corp. to keep jurors from seeing evidence about foreign conduct and antitrust investigations.
-
March 09, 2012
LCD Consumers Worry Joint Trial Will Confuse Jury
Consumers suing liquid-crystal display manufacturers for price-fixing are worried that trying their case together with direct purchasers would confuse jurors with conflicting evidence about how much of the overcharge was passed on, and asked a California federal judge Thursday to split the litigation into two trials.