Litigating FRAND Rates After Fed. Circ. Ericsson Decision

By Larry Sandell (January 17, 2020, 3:17 PM EST) -- Notwithstanding that fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory patent licenses are the standard way to deal with standard-essential patents, case law provides little clarity on how FRAND rates should be determined.

Given this — and the inherent difficultly in apportioning inventive value among the potentially thousands of SEPs that may encumber a given technological standard — litigants on both sides of FRAND cases understandably struggle with preparing and trying their respective damages cases.

But in this evolving legal area, certain best practices stand out for FRAND cases involving a retrospective "release payment" claim for past unlicensed sales: Litigants should focus on distilling a...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!