Post-Spokeo, Not All Statutory Violations Are Created Equal

Law360, New York (February 10, 2017, 11:49 AM EST) -- When the U.S. Supreme Court decided Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), a little over a year ago, many lawyers believed the court's decision would settle a rather simple question: If a defendant violates a statute, is that sufficient for a plaintiff to sue in federal court? Unfortunately, the Supreme Court's decision has not provided the hoped-for clarity, as practitioners and courts still struggle with whether a statutory violation is — by itself — sufficient to confer standing. Two recent appellate court decisions — decided the same day — highlight this issue....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!