The Loss Of Confidentiality In NY Arbitral Enforcement Cases

Law360, New York (February 27, 2017, 10:33 AM EST) -- Individuals and corporate entities alike choose arbitration to resolve their disputes for many reasons, not the least of which is the ability to shield such disputes from the prying eyes of the public. Indeed, confidentiality and the private nature of arbitration are critical to ensuring access to justice without any associated fear of negative publicity or unwanted disclosure of confidential or private information. However, a sobering series of decisions over the years from the federal district courts in New York has made clear that the valued benefits of confidentiality attendant to the arbitration itself—derived primarily from the parties' agreement or the rules of arbitration they have chosen—will almost assuredly be rendered ineffectual if and when recognition and enforcement is sought in New York....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!